Day 88. Your client — a young man accused under BNS Section 109 (attempt to murder, punishable with imprisonment for life where hurt is caused) — has been rotting in Tihar since his arrest. The IO has been asking for "two more weeks" at every remand hearing. The Magistrate keeps extending custody mechanically.
You count the days again. First remand: June 1st. Today: August 28th. That is 89 days of judicial custody. The offence carries life imprisonment — so the statutory limit is 90 days. No chargesheet has been filed.
Tomorrow morning — Day 90 — if the IO has still not filed the chargesheet by the time the court opens, your client acquires something no judge can take away: an indefeasible constitutional right to bail. Not discretionary. Not subject to the prosecution's opposition. Not dependent on the merits of the case. A right.
The question is: will you be ready at 10:30 AM to exercise it? NyayaVeda AI provides citation-verified research on default bail computation, custody day-counting, and jurisdiction-specific precedents.
What Is Default Bail?
Default bail is the indefeasible statutory right of an undertrial prisoner to be released when the investigating agency fails to file a chargesheet within the prescribed period under BNSS Section 187(3) — 90 days where the offence is punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for ten years or more, and 60 days for any other offence. The right flows from Article 21 and cannot be overridden by the prosecution's opposition.
The Constitutional Foundation
Default bail is not a legislative favour — it is a constitutional mandate flowing from Article 21. The Supreme Court in Uday Mohanlal Acharya v. State of Maharashtra (2001, Constitution Bench) held:
"The right to default bail under the proviso to Section 167(2) CrPC is an indefeasible right which accrues when the investigation is not completed within the specified period. Once the right has accrued, it cannot be taken away."
What "indefeasible" actually means in practice:
- The court CANNOT refuse it on grounds that the offence is serious
- The court CANNOT refuse it because the prosecution says investigation is "almost complete"
- The court CANNOT refuse it because the IO is on leave or the forensic report is pending
- The prosecution CANNOT defeat it by filing the chargesheet after the accused has applied
- The only thing that can prevent the right from being exercised is the accused's own failure to apply for it
The Time Limits: Know Them Cold
Under BNSS Section 187(3), the chargesheet must be filed within:
| Offence Category | Maximum Punishment | Deadline | What Happens on Day 61/91/181 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Any other offence | Less than 10 years | 60 days | Indefeasible right accrues on Day 61 |
| Offences punishable with 10 years or more, life, or death | 10 years or more, life, or death | 90 days | Indefeasible right accrues on Day 91 |
| NDPS (commercial quantity) | 10+ years under NDPS | 180 days | Indefeasible right accrues on Day 181 |
| UAPA offences | As per UAPA | 90 days (extendable to 180 by the court on the Public Prosecutor's report, UAPA Section 43D(2)) | If extended — Day 181 |
Critical Nuance: The punishment that determines the deadline is the maximum punishment for the offence charged — not the likely sentence. If the FIR mentions BNS 103 (murder — life/death), the limit is 90 days even if the case is weak and conviction is unlikely.
Day-Counting: Where Most Cases Are Won or Lost
The precision of day-counting is everything. One day off and your application is either premature (dismissed) or too late (chargesheet filed while you waited).
How to Count
| Rule | Detail |
|---|---|
| Day 1 | The first day of judicial custody (the day the Magistrate grants first remand). NOT the date of arrest if the accused was produced the same day |
| Include holidays | Sundays, Saturdays, gazetted holidays — all count. Custody does not pause for holidays |
| Include the day of arrest? | If arrested and produced before Magistrate on the same day — that day is Day 1. If arrested late evening and produced next day — next day is Day 1 |
| Multiple remand extensions | Count continuously. Every remand hearing date is NOT a restart — it is a continuation |
| Remand in one case, custody in another | Each case has its own computation. Being in custody for FIR No. 1 does not extend the period for FIR No. 2 |
Worked Example
| Event | Date | Day Count |
|---|---|---|
| Arrested at 2 AM | 1 June | — |
| Produced before Magistrate, remand granted | 1 June | Day 1 |
| Remand extended (14 days) | 15 June | Day 15 |
| Remand extended (14 days) | 29 June | Day 29 |
| Remand extended (14 days) | 13 July | Day 43 |
| Remand extended (14 days) | 27 July | Day 57 |
| Remand extended (14 days) | 10 August | Day 71 |
| Remand extended (14 days) | 24 August | Day 85 |
| Day 90 — deadline for 10+ year offences | 29 August | Day 90 |
| Day 91 — right accrues (if no chargesheet) | 30 August | FILE APPLICATION AT 10:30 AM |
Practice Tip: Maintain a custody computation chart from Day 1. Update it at every remand hearing. Share it with the client's family so they know the exact date the right accrues. On the critical day, arrive at court before the registry opens.
The Race: Your Application vs Their Chargesheet
This is the most litigated aspect of default bail — what happens when the chargesheet and the bail application arrive on the same day or within hours of each other.
Three Scenarios
Scenario 1: You file the application BEFORE the chargesheet is filed.
- Result: Right is crystallised. Bail MUST be granted.
- Even if the IO rushes in with the chargesheet 10 minutes later, it is too late
- Rabi Prakash v. State of Odisha (2022): "Once the indefeasible right has accrued and has been availed of, the subsequent filing of chargesheet cannot extinguish it"
Scenario 2: The chargesheet is filed BEFORE you apply.
- Result: The right is extinguished (majority view).
- Once the chargesheet is on record, the statutory period is satisfied. No default bail
- The accused must now apply for regular bail on merits under BNSS 480/483
- This is why filing on Day 61/91 morning is critical
Scenario 3: Both filed on the same day — timing unclear.
- Result: Contested. Court examines timestamps.
- The registry's stamp on the bail application vs the IO's filing timestamp
- Courts have gone both ways. Some give benefit of doubt to the accused (Article 21 tilt); others rely strictly on timestamps
- Safest strategy: File your application FIRST THING in the morning on Day 61/91 — before 10:30 AM
Defence Practice Tip: On Day 60 or Day 89, tell the Magistrate on record: "My Lord, I wish to place on record that the statutory period of 60/90 days expires tomorrow. If no chargesheet is filed by then, I shall be filing an application for default bail." This creates a record that pre-dates the chargesheet — powerful in Scenario 3 disputes.
The Police Counter-Tactics: What They Do and How to Beat Them
Experienced IOs know about default bail deadlines. Here is what they do:
Tactic 1: The "Preliminary" or "Incomplete" Chargesheet
The IO files a chargesheet on Day 59 or Day 89 that is clearly incomplete — missing forensic reports, witness statements not recorded, investigation "ongoing." But it technically satisfies the Section 193 BNSS minimum requirements.
Does this defeat default bail? Unfortunately, yes in most courts. The Supreme Court in Satpal v. State of Haryana (2018) held that even an incomplete chargesheet, if it meets the minimum statutory requirements, prevents default bail from accruing.
Your counter: File an application before the Trial Court pointing out that the chargesheet is a sham filed solely to defeat the statutory right. While this rarely succeeds in preventing the chargesheet from being accepted, it creates a record for the bail application — argue that the prosecution's inability to complete investigation in 60/90 days, combined with the sham chargesheet, demonstrates that the case is weak and bail should be granted on merits.
Tactic 2: Seeking Remand Extension with Consent
At the remand hearing on Day 55, the IO requests 30 more days of custody. Your predecessor lawyer (or worse, you) says "no objection."
This is a waiver. If the accused, through counsel, consents to extension of remand beyond the statutory period, the right to default bail may be waived. Uday Mohanlal Acharya (2001) noted that the right must be "availed of" — implied consent to extended custody is treated as non-availment.
Rule: NEVER consent to remand extension beyond Day 60/90. At every remand hearing after Day 45, state on record: "The defence does not consent to further remand beyond the statutory period."
Tactic 3: Re-Arresting After Default Bail
The accused gets default bail. Two days later, the IO arrests them again — either in the same case (if chargesheet is now filed) or in a "new" FIR spun off from the same facts.
Your remedy: File an application for quashing the re-arrest as an abuse of process. Cite Siddharth v. State of UP (2021): re-arrest on the same facts to defeat default bail is impermissible. For a "new" FIR on the same facts, seek quashing under BNSS 528.
What the Magistrate Actually Does
When you file a default bail application, here is what happens:
- 2Magistrate checks the case diary — has a chargesheet been filed? If no → proceed
- 4Magistrate counts the days — from first remand to today. If 60/90+ days → proceed
- 6Prosecution objects — the PP almost always says "chargesheet is being prepared, please grant 2 more days." This objection is legally irrelevant to default bail
- 8Magistrate grants bail — imposes conditions (bond, surety, passport surrender, cooperation)
- 10You furnish the bond immediately — do not leave court without executing the bond
What if the Magistrate refuses? This happens — some Magistrates are reluctant to release serious offenders on default bail. File an immediate application before the Sessions Court under BNSS 483 (formerly CrPC 439). If Sessions Court also refuses (rare but possible), approach the High Court the same day. Every hour matters because the prosecution is racing to file the chargesheet.
Bail Bond and Conditions
Default bail is a right, but conditions are standard:
| Condition | Typical |
|---|---|
| Personal bond | Rs 25,000 – Rs 5,00,000 (proportional to offence gravity) |
| Surety | One or two local sureties with property/income proof |
| Passport surrender | Common in serious offences |
| Station reporting | Weekly or fortnightly |
| No contact with witnesses | Standard |
| Not leaving jurisdiction | Without court permission |
Critical: Furnish the bond THE SAME DAY the bail is granted. An unexecuted bail order is worthless — the accused remains in custody, and the prosecution may file the chargesheet in the interim, complicating matters.
Default Bail vs Regular Bail vs Anticipatory Bail
| Parameter | Default Bail | Regular Bail | Anticipatory Bail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trigger | Chargesheet not filed in time | After arrest (any time) | Before arrest |
| Nature | INDEFEASIBLE RIGHT | Court's discretion | Court's discretion |
| Can court refuse? | NO (if conditions met) | YES | YES |
| Severity of offence matters? | NO | YES — heavily | YES — heavily |
| Evidence strength matters? | NO | YES | YES |
| Prosecution can oppose? | Legally irrelevant | Yes, and court weighs it | Yes, and court weighs it |
| Section | BNSS 187(3) | BNSS 480/483 | BNSS 482 |
| Can be cancelled? | Yes (on violation of conditions) | Yes | Yes |
Landmark Judgments: The Complete Canon
| Case | Year | Bench | What It Decided | When to Cite |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uday Mohanlal Acharya v. State of Maharashtra | 2001 | Constitution Bench | Default bail is an indefeasible right. Cannot be defeated by subsequent chargesheet | Every default bail application |
| Rakesh Kumar Paul v. State of Assam | 2017 | 2-Judge | Right accrues on expiry. Must be "availed of" by filing application. Debate on whether unfiled application before chargesheet = loss of right | When discussing the availing requirement |
| M. Ravindran v. Intelligence Officer | 2021 | 2-Judge | Default bail applies to NDPS cases. 180-day limit for commercial quantity | NDPS default bail matters |
| Rabi Prakash v. State of Odisha | 2022 | 2-Judge | Once right accrues AND is availed, subsequent chargesheet cannot extinguish it — even if filed same day | The race scenario (your app vs chargesheet) |
| Bikramjit Singh v. State of Punjab | 2020 | 2-Judge | Day of remand = Day 1. Holidays are included in computation | Day-counting disputes |
| S. Kasi v. State | 2020 | Madras HC | Default bail application can be filed orally or in writing — no formality prescribed | When Magistrate insists on written application |
| Satpal v. State of Haryana | 2018 | 2-Judge | Incomplete chargesheet, if meeting minimum statutory requirements, prevents default bail | When prosecution files sham chargesheet |
7 Mistakes That Destroy Default Bail Applications
- 2
Miscounting days by even one — Your application on Day 59 is premature (dismissed). Your application on Day 92 (when chargesheet arrived on Day 91) is too late. Count from Day 1 of judicial custody, include every calendar day.
- 4
Not filing the application the MINUTE the deadline expires — Every hour you delay is an hour the IO uses to file the chargesheet. Day 61/91, first thing in the morning, before the registry even opens if possible.
- 6
Consenting to remand extension beyond the deadline — At the Day 55 remand hearing, if your lawyer says "no objection to 14 more days" — that is a potential waiver of the right.
- 8
Not furnishing bail bond immediately — The Magistrate grants default bail at 11 AM. You go home to arrange sureties. By 3 PM, the IO files the chargesheet. Now there is a Scenario 3 dispute. Furnish the bond within the hour.
- 10
Relying on oral application alone — While legally sufficient (S. Kasi v. State), a written application with a dated registry stamp is infinitely more valuable in a timing dispute.
- 12
Not recording opposition to extended remand — At every remand hearing after Day 45, state on record: "Defence objects to further remand beyond the statutory period under BNSS 187." Create the paper trail.
- 14
Assuming the right survives indefinitely — The right accrues on Day 61/91 but must be "availed of" by filing the application. If you wait until Day 100 and the chargesheet was filed on Day 92, the right is extinguished (majority view). The window is narrow — use it immediately.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the prosecution seek an extension of the 60/90-day period?
No, under general criminal law (BNSS). There is no provision for extending the 60/90-day period for ordinary BNS offences. Certain special statutes create exceptions: UAPA Section 43D(2) allows extension from 90 to 180 days on the Public Prosecutor's report. NDPS commercial quantity cases have a built-in 180-day limit. For ordinary BNS offences — 60 or 90 days is final.
What if the chargesheet is filed at 4 PM on Day 90, and my application was filed at 10 AM?
Your application takes priority. You filed first. The right was availed of before the chargesheet was filed. Rabi Prakash v. State of Odisha (2022) is directly on point — once the right is availed, subsequent chargesheet cannot extinguish it. Request the Magistrate to note the timestamps of both filings.
Can default bail be granted for murder and rape cases?
Yes — emphatically yes. Default bail is not discretionary. The nature of the offence, however serious, does not affect the indefeasible right. The only variable is the deadline: murder (BNS 103, life/death) has a 90-day limit; sexual offences (BNS 63-72) depending on punishment have either 60 or 90 days. If the deadline passes without chargesheet — bail is a right.
Police filed a chargesheet but it names my client as "absconding." Does default bail apply?
No. A person who is "absconding" is not in custody — default bail is a right that accrues only to persons in judicial custody. If your client was never arrested and the chargesheet names them as absconding, default bail does not apply. They should seek regular bail or anticipatory bail.
Can the Magistrate impose conditions so stringent that default bail becomes meaningless?
Courts have consistently held that conditions must be reasonable. A bond of Rs 50 lakhs for a person with no assets is an indirect denial of bail. Challenge excessive conditions before the Sessions Court or High Court. Cite Sanjay Chandra v. CBI (2012): "The object of bail is to secure the attendance of the accused, not to punish."
My client was arrested in 2 separate FIRs. Chargesheet filed in FIR-1 but not in FIR-2. Can we get default bail for FIR-2?
Yes. Each FIR is a separate case with independent custody computation. If the 60/90-day period has expired for FIR-2 without chargesheet, default bail accrues for FIR-2 regardless of FIR-1's status. However, physical release will only happen if the client is not in custody for FIR-1. Verify this analysis using NyayaVeda AI's source-verified research platform.
Quick Reference Card
⚖️ DEFAULT BAIL — PRACTITIONER'S QUICK REFERENCE
PROVISION: BNSS Section 187(3) (was the proviso to CrPC 167(2)) NATURE: INDEFEASIBLE RIGHT (not discretion) COURT: Magistrate (where remand was granted)
TIME LIMITS:
- Below 10 years: 60 days
- 10 years / life / death: 90 days
- NDPS commercial: 180 days
THE RACE RULE: Application filed BEFORE chargesheet → RIGHT CRYSTALLISED Chargesheet filed BEFORE application → RIGHT EXTINGUISHED
DAY-COUNTING:
- Day 1 = first day of judicial custody
- Include all holidays
- Count continuously across remand extensions
GOLDEN RULES:
- 2File written application on Day 61/91 morning
- 4NEVER consent to remand beyond statutory period
- 6Furnish bail bond SAME DAY as grant order
- 8Object to extended remand on record from Day 45
KEY CASE: Uday Mohanlal Acharya (2001, Constitution Bench): "Indefeasible right. Cannot be defeated."
Research Default Bail Precedents with NyayaVeda AI
Day 89 and you need the exact SC ratio on default bail computation, or an order from your specific court confirming the right? NyayaVeda AI delivers source-verified citations.
- Default bail precedents for your specific offence category
- Custody period computation case law from your HC jurisdiction
- Orders on "incomplete chargesheet" and "race condition" issues
- Hindi + English — research in your preferred language
🔒 Advocate Privacy Shield Concerned about client confidentiality? NyayaVeda AI is DPDP Act 2023 compliant. Automatic Aadhaar/PAN/Phone masking. What is stored, for how long, and how to delete it is set out in our Privacy Policy. Client privacy is our responsibility.
Corpus Status: The corpus holds the Central Acts and the judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts. Tribunal and subordinate-court decisions are not in it, so a question that needs one is answered as insufficient evidence.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal matters, consult a qualified advocate registered with the Bar Council of India.
Last Updated: September 2026 | Author: NyayaVeda Legal Research Team
Research these topics with source-verified citations
858 Central Acts · 1.2 crore+ judgments · BNS/BNSS/BSA auto-concordance · Citation-verified · Hindi supported
Related Guides from Other Practice Areas
Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal matters, consult a qualified advocate registered with the Bar Council of India. NyayaVeda AI is an AI-powered research tool, not a law firm, and does not establish any advocate-client relationship.